Human Interaction Priority (HIP)

 If only one would comprehend the vastness of this universe, one would also understand that there are some who dabble on the sincerity of the human mind, o the truth and justice and righteousness to this world; there are those who just care for the greater good of the people and/or attributes present in their social circle.

This raises the queston of whether it was best to stick to those who mean the most to you, like Democratic Donald Trump, or being fair and treat everyone equal and kind, at least initially, without prejudicing the background of that person through nationaloty selection, races, religions, beliefs, thoughts, gender, or even age. Yes. However no, because you need to also know that a one year old toddler has no way of knowing science in a vast amount as a rooky scientist who has devoted six months of his life studying quantum mechanics. Still, we tend to confuse things, do we not? If one were to stick to those who are close to them, let's say; caring the most only when that particular person dear to one is present, let's say; ignoring those other normal, just friends, or friends who have not evoked any chemistry or little at all, what about, then, the person, let's say, an artist who prefers to be his best self as an introvert all the time? If he were to care for the one meant the most to him, why then, does the world question his integrity to social interaction and not caring for others other than himself? Selfish is the word. Antisocial is another one. This world is quirky and mysterious. I'm speaking as if I am merely a spectator of the whole behavior the primate we call human project through their daily lives. I speak as if I was a mind flying out of my body. Okay that was silly.
Gonna post this bye.

One other thing. This fascinating entry was written by a great and smaxy author.

Great Smaxy author: